至少在部分电信区域，情况已经显著改善。而联通在高峰时段的延迟似乎仍然大幅增加，但很难判断这是否仅限于特定区域，还是全国范围内普遍存在。我附上了一些监控截图。电信区域是江苏无锡，联通区域是江苏阳城。
我认为情况不太可能大幅改善，但我们也无从知晓。中国联通不会告诉任何人他们何时进行改进/容量升级，情况恶化时也是如此。AS4837 现在肯定比六月初好多了。
这取决于你使用服务器做什么，我假设有人从中国各地访问它，这使得我们很难简单地监控镜像 IP。
遗憾的是，CMIN2 与电信的丢包仍然很严重，与联通的延迟增加看起来与 AS4837 非常相似。我不确定 AS4837 和 CMIN2 之间的带宽吞吐量对比如何。 CMIN2 的主要优势可能仅停留在中国移动身上，这就是为什么我们正在考虑在 CMIN2 网络上添加其他选项来改善电信和联通（例如 AS9929）。
It has improved significantly for at least some Telecom regions, for Unicom it still seems to have a large latency increase at peak time but it's hard to tell if that's just that specific region or more widely throughout China. I've attached some screenshots from our monitoring. The Telecom region is Wuxi, Jiangsu and the Unicom region is Yangcheng, Jiangsu.
I think it isn't likely to get much better but we never know, China Unicom don't tell anyone when they're making improvements/capacity upgrades, same goes for when it gets worse. AS4837 is certainly a lot better now than it was at the start of June.
It depends what you're doing with your server, I assume you have people accessing it from across China, making it harder to simply monitor our looking glass IPs.
CMIN2 sadly still has significant packet loss with Telecom, the latency increase with Unicom looks quite similar to AS4837. I'm not sure what the bandwidth throughput comparison between AS4837 and CMIN2 is. CMIN2's main benefit will probably remain with only China Mobile, which is why we're considering other options to add to our CMIN2 networking to improve Telecom and Unicom (such as AS9929).
上个月帮我免费换到CMIN2了（只有免费5T)，现在还有必要换回4837吗？ |
发表于 2025-6-20 11:17:23
QQ好友和群
QQ空间
收藏
