Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=283ms TTL=47
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=289ms TTL=47
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=283ms TTL=47
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=47
Ping statistics for 96.30.24.92:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 283ms, Maximum = 289ms, Average = 284ms
————————————————————————
Pinging 66.40.65.7 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 66.40.65.7:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 205ms, Maximum = 207ms, Average = 206ms作者: cpuer 时间: 2009-8-26 13:43
96.30.24.92 WiredTree芝加哥机房。
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 96.30.24.92
Pinging 96.30.24.92 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=45
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=45
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=45
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=45
Ping statistics for 96.30.24.92:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 250ms, Maximum = 282ms, Average = 265ms作者: cpuer 时间: 2009-8-26 13:49
66.40.65.7 Peer1 加州机房
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 66.40.65.7
Pinging 66.40.65.7 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=233ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=233ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=232ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=231ms TTL=49
Ping statistics for 66.40.65.7:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 231ms, Maximum = 233ms, Average = 232ms作者: cpuer 时间: 2009-8-26 13:50
补充,我是厦门电信。作者: tumour 时间: 2009-8-26 14:11
还是加州的快啊。作者: cpuer 时间: 2009-8-26 14:54 标题: 回复 6# 的帖子 呵呵,一般是这样。作者: b81334548 时间: 2009-8-26 18:07 谢谢楼上的朋友们.
没有网通的吗?作者: cpuer 时间: 2009-8-26 18:13 标题: 回复 8# 的帖子 等待网通。作者: zyypp 时间: 2009-8-26 18:23
郑州 网通
----------------
C:\>ping 96.30.24.92
Pinging 96.30.24.92 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=298ms TTL=46
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=295ms TTL=46
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=293ms TTL=46
Reply from 96.30.24.92: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=46
Ping statistics for 96.30.24.92:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 291ms, Maximum = 298ms, Average = 294ms
----------------------------------------------------------------
C:\>ping 66.40.65.7
Pinging 66.40.65.7 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=238ms TTL=43
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=237ms TTL=43
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=237ms TTL=43
Reply from 66.40.65.7: bytes=32 time=239ms TTL=43
Ping statistics for 66.40.65.7:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 237ms, Maximum = 239ms, Average = 237ms作者: b81334548 时间: 2009-8-26 18:30
谢谢楼上的作者: zyypp 时间: 2009-8-26 18:33
四川绵阳电信机房
ping 96.30.24.92 -c 4
PING 96.30.24.92 (96.30.24.92) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 96.30.24.92: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=325 ms
64 bytes from 96.30.24.92: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=324 ms
64 bytes from 96.30.24.92: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=323 ms
64 bytes from 96.30.24.92: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=324 ms
--- 96.30.24.92 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 323.431/324.251/325.376/0.908 ms
ping 66.40.65.7 -c 4
PING 66.40.65.7 (66.40.65.7) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 66.40.65.7: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=257 ms
64 bytes from 66.40.65.7: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=254 ms
64 bytes from 66.40.65.7: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=253 ms
64 bytes from 66.40.65.7: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=252 ms